Renal function in liver recipients: in-depth analysis of data from the Local Scientific Transplant Registry of the Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center
https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2025-17-2-138-156
Abstract
Background. Renal dysfunction is common in liver transplant candidates and recipients. However, despite more than 30 years of experience with liver transplantation in Russia, this problem has not been systematically studied in large cohorts of patients.
The objective was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of renal dysfunction before liver transplantation (LT), during the first postoperative week, at discharge, and one year after surgery.
Material and methods. A single-center registry study included data on 550 LTs from living (73%) and deceased (27%) donors performed consecutively between May 2010 and July 2024. Estimated Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the 2021 CKD-EPI Creatinine formula. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was diagnosed and staged according to RIFLE criteria between 12 hours and day 7 after LT.
Results. The median eGFR before LT (n=550), at discharge (n=472) and one year after surgery (n=257) were 107 (86;119), 103 (75;116) and 79 (62;100) mL/min/1.73 m2, and the proportions of patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 7.1%, 12.7%, and 22.2%, respectively. AKI complicated 33.0% of LTs, including 16.6% cases with RIFLE > I. Renal replacement therapy was used in 7.3% recipients. For the combination of AKI RIFLE > I and early allograft dysfunction (EAD), the 30-day graft survival was 26%, 95%CI: [14–39%].
Recipient age (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, p<0.001), arterial hypertension (HR 2.2, p=0.010), eGFR at discharge < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and tacrolimus trough level (HR 1.18, p<0.001) were independent risk factors for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 one year after LT. The medians of eGFR decline during the first year after LT in cases of de novo administration or conversion to everolimus-based regimens were 11 and 23 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.115) and were not significantly different from the median eGFR decline among recipients never receiving everolimus: p=0.485 and p=0.132, respectively. Five-year survival of recipients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at one year after LT was 89.0%, while for eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, it was 88.7%, p=0.760.
Conclusions. Renal function assessment should be an obligatory part of the follow-up of patients on the waiting list and after LT. Particular attention should be paid to elderly patients, with arterial hypertension, reduced baseline eGFR, post-LT AKI RIFLE > I (especially in combination with EAD). Irrespective of the time after LT, excessive exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus trough level > 10 ng/mL) should be avoided, using combinations with mycophenolates or everolimus if necessary.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. I. SushkovRussian Federation
Alexander I. Sushkov - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of Laboratory of New Surgical Technologies
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
V. S. Rudakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir S. Rudakov - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Surgeon, Surgery and Transplantation Center
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
M. V. Popov
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Popov - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory of New Surgical Technologies; Head of Department of X-ray Surgical Methods of Diagnostics and Treatment, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
A. E. Kalachyan
Russian Federation
Albert E. Kalachyan - Graduate Student, Department of Surgery with courses of Oncology, Endoscopy, Surgical Pathology, Clinical Transplantation and Organ Donation, Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education; Laboratory assistant researcher, Laboratory of New Surgical Technologies, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
E. V. Naydenov
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Naydenov - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory of New Surgical Technologies; Surgeon, Surgery and Transplantation Center, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
A. I. Artemiev
Russian Federation
Alexey I. Artemiev - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Surgical Department No. 2, Surgery and Transplantation Center; Associate Professor of the Department of Surgery with courses of Oncology, Endoscopy, Surgical Pathology, Clinical Transplantation and Organ Donation, Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
S. E. Voskanyan
Russian Federation
Sergey E. Voskanyan - Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Care – Head of Surgery and Transplantation Center; Head of Department of Surgery with courses of Oncology, Endoscopy, Surgical Pathology, Clinical Transplantation and Organ Donation, Medical and Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education, State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
23, Marshal Novikov St., Moscow 123098
References
1. Konstantinov BA, Eramishantsev AK, Gautier SV, Tsirulnikova OM, Skipenko OG, Lebezev VM, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation (first clinical experience). Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 1993;(3):32–44. (In Russ.).
2. Shumakov VI, Moysyuk YG, Kozlov IA, Tarabarko NV, Petrova GN, Itkin GP, et al. First experience with orthotopic transplantation of the liver in clinic. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 1991;(1):98–105. (In Russ.).
3. Novruzbekov MS, Gulyaev VA, Lutsyk KN, Akhmetshin RB, Olisov OD, Magomedov KM, et al. Liver transplantation program at N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of emergency medicine: stages, achievements, and outlooks. Bulletin of the Medical Institute «REAVIZ» (Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health). 2020;(3):162– 173. (In Russ.).
4. Voskanyan SE, Sushkov AI, Artemiev AI, Rudakov VS, Kolyshev IYu, Gubarev KK, et al. Liver transplantation program at the Burnasyan Federal Biophysical Center: experience in 500 procedures. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(7):45–60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20240714
5. Zubenko SI, Monakhov AR, Boldyrev MA, Salimov VR, Smolianinova AD, Gautier SV. Risk factors in deceased donor liver transplantation: a single centre experience. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2022;24(4):7–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2022-4-7-14
6. Thongprayoon C, Kaewput W, Thamcharoen N, Bathini T, Watthanasuntorn K, Lertjitbanjong P, et al. Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(3):372. PMID: 30884912 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030372
7. Zhou J, Zhang X, Lyu L, Ma X, Miao G, Chu H. Modifiable risk factors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):149. PMID: 33888081 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02360-8
8. Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Young EW, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(10):931–940. PMID: 12954741 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021744
9. Lim SY, Wang R, Tan DJH, Ng CH, Lim WH, Quek J, et al. A meta-analysis of the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2021;34(12):2524–2533. PMID: 34714569 https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.14149
10. Zhuravel SV, Dorofeyeva EN, Kuznetsova NK, Chugunov AO, Kiselev VV, Talyzin AM, et al. Renal replacement therapy after liver transplantation. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2009;(1):49–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2009-0-1-49-52
11. Kosmacheva ED, Babich AE. Kidney functional changes over time in liver recipients. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2018;10(4):265–273. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2018-10-4-265-273
12. Syutkin VE, Andreytseva OI, Nikulina VP, Chugunov AO. The experience of use of everolimus in patients having undergone to orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2012;(1–2):10–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2012-0-1-2-10-14
13. Khubutia MSh, Syutkin VE, Kuznetsova NK, Zhuravel SV, Novruzbekov MS. Longterm use of everolimus as a component of immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2013;(2):23–27. (In Russ.).
14. Gerasimova OA, Granov DA, Zherebtsov FK. Everolimus in clinical practice after liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2017;19(2):34–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2017-2-34-40
15. Syutkin VE, Salienko AA, Olisov OD, Zhuravel SV, Novruzbekov MS. The effect of early everolimus administration on the renal function while reducing the dosage of calcineurin inhibitors in liver transplant recipients in a long-term follow-up. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2021;13(2):121–129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-121-129
16. Syutkin VE, Salienko AA, Zhuravel SV, Novruzbekov MS. Changes in glomerular filtration rate in liver recipients after reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors with concomitant everolimus administration within the first year after immunosuppression conversion. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2021;23(4):32–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15825/25/1995-1191-2021-4-32-41
17. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y, et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(19):1737– 1749. PMID: 34554658 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953
18. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S):S117–S314. PMID: 38490803 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
19. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8(4):R204–212. PMID: 15312219 https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2872
20. Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, Kaminski M, Abecassis M, Emond J, et al. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(8):943–949. PMID: 20677285 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22091
21. Tonon M, Rosi S, Gambino CG, Piano S, Calvino V, Romano A, et al. Natural history of acute kidney disease in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2021;74(3):578–583. PMID: 32918956 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.037
22. Bassegoda O, Huelin P, Ariza X, Sole C, Juanola A, Gratacos-Gines J, et al. Development of chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis is common and impairs clinical outcomes. J Hepatol. 2020;72(6):1132– 1139. PMID: 31953138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.020
23. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):1–138. Available at: https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/KDIGO-2012-AKIGuideline-English.pdf [Accessed March 27, 2025]
24. Lameire NH, Levin A, Kellum JA, Cheung M, Jadoul M, Winkelmayer WC, et al. Harmonizing acute and chronic kidney disease definition and classification: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference. Kidney Int. 2021;100(3):516– 526. PMID: 34252450 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.06.028
25. Nadim MK, Kellum JA, Forni L, Francoz C, Asrani SK, Ostermann M, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting. J Hepatol. 2024;81(1):163– 183. PMID: 38527522 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.03.031
26. Jan MY, Patidar KR, Ghabril MS, Kubal CA. Optimization of kidney health in liver transplant candidates: pretransplant considerations and modalities. Transplantation. 2024;108(7):1542– 1550. PMID: 38192019 https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004851
27. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–470. PMID: 10075613 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002
28. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. PMID: 19414839 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
29. Francoz C, Nadim MK, Baron A, Prie D, Antoine C, Belghiti J, et al. Glomerular filtration rate equations for liver-kidney transplantation in patients with cirrhosis: validation of current recommendations. Hepatology. 2014;59(4):1514–1521. PMID: 24037821 https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26704
30. De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L, Metselaar HJ, Beckebaum S, Saliba F, et al. Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(11):3008–3020. PMID: 22882750 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04212.x
31. Saliba F, De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L, Metselaar HJ, Beckebaum S, et al. Renal function at two years in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus: results of a randomized, multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(7):1734– 1745. PMID: 23714399 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12280
32. Fischer L, Saliba F, Kaiser GM, De Carlis L, Metselaar HJ, De Simone P, et al. Three-year outcomes in de novo liver transplant patients receiving everolimus with reduced tacrolimus: follow-up results from a randomized, multicenter study. Transplantation. 2015;99(7):1455– 1462. PMID: 26151607 https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000555
33. Lee SG, Jeng LB, Saliba F, Singh Soin A, Lee WC, De Simone P, et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients: 24-month results from the pooled analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials. Transplantation. 2021;105(7):1564– 1575. PMID: 33741847 https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003394
34. Jeng LB, Lee SG, Soin AS, Lee WC, Suh KS, Joo DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplant recipients: 12-month results of a randomized multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(6):1435–1446. PMID: 29237235 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14623
35. Suh KS, Jeng LB, Soin AS, Lee WC, Lee SG, Grant D, et al. Renal function outcomes with everolimus plus reducedexposure tacrolimus in de novo living donor liver transplantation: 24-month results from the H2307 study. Transplantation. 2018;102(Suppl 7):S21– S22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000542566.18089.a5
36. Fischer L, Klempnauer J, Beckebaum S, Metselaar HJ, Neuhaus P, Schemmer P, et al. A randomized, controlled study to assess the conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors to everolimus after liver transplantation--PROTECT. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(7):1855–65. PMID: 22494671 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04049.x
37. Sterneck M, Kaiser GM, Heyne N, Richter N, Rauchfuss F, Pascher A, et al. Everolimus and early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal: 3-year results from a randomized trial in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(3):701– 710. PMID: 24502384 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12615
38. Sterneck M, Kaiser GM, Heyne N, Richter N, Rauchfuss F, Pascher A, et al. Long-term follow-up of five yr shows superior renal function with everolimus plus early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in the PROTECT randomized liver transplantation study. Clin Transplant. 2016;30(6):741–8. PMID: 27160359 https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12744
39. Saliba F, Duvoux C, Gugenheim J, Kamar N, Dharancy S, Salame E, et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus and mycophenolic acid with early tacrolimus withdrawal after liver transplantation: a multicenter randomized trial. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(7):1843–1852. PMID: 28133906 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14212
40. Saliba F, Duvoux C, Dharancy S, Dumortier J, Calmus Y, Gugenheim J, et al. Early switch from tacrolimus to everolimus after liver transplantation: outcomes at 2 years. Liver Transpl. 2019;25(12):1822–1832. PMID: 31631501 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25664
41. Nashan B, Schemmer P, Braun F, Dworak M, Wimmer P, Schlitt H. Evaluating the efficacy, safety and evolution of renal function with early initiation of everolimus-facilitated tacrolimus reduction in de novo liver transplant recipients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;(16):118. PMID: 25873064 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0626-0
42. Nashan B, Schemmer P, Braun F, Schlitt HJ, Pascher A, Klein CG, et al. Early everolimus-facilitated reduced tacrolimus in liver transplantation: results from the randomized HEPHAISTOS trial. Liver Transpl. 2022;28(6):998-1010. PMID: 34525259 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.26298
43. Saliba F, Duvoux C, Dharancy S, Dumortier J, Calmus Y, Gugenheim J, et al. Five-year outcomes in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus with or without a calcineurin inhibitor: results from the CERTITUDE study. Liver Int. 2022;42(11):2513–2523. PMID: 35962772 https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.15396
44. Bilbao I, Salcedo M, Gomez MA, Jimenez C, Castroagudin J, Fabregat J, et al. Renal function improvement in liver transplant recipients after early everolimus conversion: a clinical practice cohort study in Spain. Liver Transpl. 2015;21(8):1056–65. PMID: 25990257 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24172
45. Saliba F, Dharancy S, Salame E, Conti F, Eyraud D, Radenne S, et al. Time to conversion to an everolimus-based regimen: renal outcomes in liver transplant recipients from the EVEROLIVER registry. Liver Transpl. 2020;26(11):1465–1476. PMID: 32869469 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25879
46. Rudzik KN, Schonder KS, Humar A, Johnson HJ. Early conversion to everolimus within 180 days of living donor liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2024;38(7):e15402. PMID: 39023099 https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15402
47. Aberg F, Berntsson J, Herlenius G, Castedal M, Bennet W. Everolimus and long-term decline in renal function after liver transplantation: real-life experience with measured GFR. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(6):718–724. PMID: 32479116 https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2020.1770328
48. Gomez-Bravo M, Prieto Castillo M, Navasa M, Sanchez-Antolin G, Llado L, Otero A, et al. Effects of everolimus plus minimized tacrolimus on kidney function in liver transplantation: REDUCE, a prospective, randomized controlled study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022;114(6):335– 342. PMID: 35469409 https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2022.8549/2021
49.
Review
For citations:
Sushkov A.I., Rudakov V.S., Popov M.V., Kalachyan A.E., Naydenov E.V., Artemiev A.I., Voskanyan S.E. Renal function in liver recipients: in-depth analysis of data from the Local Scientific Transplant Registry of the Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2025;17(2):138-156. https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2025-17-2-138-156