Современные библиометрические критерии, применяемые для оценки научной деятельности
Аннотация
Проанализированы наиболее применяемые в нашей стране формальные критерии оценки результатов научной деятельности. Проведен анализ публикаций журнала «Трансплантология» с применением наукометрических критериев.
Ключевые слова
Список литературы
1. Archakov A.I., Karpova E.A., Ponomarenko E.A. Mezhdunarodnye kriterii effektivnosti nauchno-issledovatel'skoy deyatel'nosti kollektivov i otdel'nykh uchenykh v oblasti biologii i meditsiny [International criteria of efficiency of research activities of groups and individual scientists in the field of biology and medicine]. Vestnik RAMN. 2013; 5: 4–9. (In Russian).
2. Vlasov V.V. Znachenie nauchnykh publikatsiy v spetsializirovannykh zhurnalakh [The value of scientific publications in peer-reviewed journals]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2010; 7: 86–89. (In Russian).
3. Vyalkov A.I., Glukhova E.A. Otsenka kachestva nauchno-issledovatel'skoy deyatel'nosti meditsinskoy organizatsii s pomoshch'yu naukometricheskikh pokazateley [Assessment of quality of the research activities of the medical organization using scientometric indicators]. Zdravookhranenie RF. 2013; 3: 3–6. (In Russian).
4. Pislyakov, V.V. Naukometricheskie metody i praktiki, rekomenduemye k primeneniyu v rabote s rossiyskim indeksom nauchnogo tsitirovaniya [Scientometric methods and practices that are recommended for use in working with the Russian Science Citation Index]. Razrabotka sistemy statisticheskogo analiza rossiyskoy nauki na osnove dannykh rossiyskogo indeksa tsitirovaniya: otchet o nauchno-issledovatel'skoy rabote promezhutochnyy) po teme. – Moscow, 2005. 24. (In Russian).
5. Tsimmerman Ya.S. Eshche raz o nekotorykh nravstvennykh printsipakh nauki i nauchnykh issledovaniy [Once again on some moral principles of science and research]. Klinicheskaya meditsina. 2009; 2: 4–7. (In Russian).
6. Shteyngardt Yu.N. Pochemu rossiyskie meditsinskie nauki «ne vperedi planety vsey» [Why Russian medical science "is not ahead of the rest"]. Zdravookhranenie RF. 2012; 6: 54–55. (In Russian).
7. Costas R., Bardons М. The h-index. Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J. Inform. 2007; 1 (3): 193–203. 8. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation througt association of ideas. Science. 1955; 122: 108–111.
8. Gevers W. Globalizing science publishing. Science. 2009; 325 (Is. 5943): 920.
9. Hirsh J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS. 2005; 102 (46): 16569–16572. 11. Lange L. The impact factor as a phantom: Is there a self-fulfilling prophecy effect of impact? J. of Documentation. 2002; 58 (2): 175–184.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Лукьянова Е.Е. Современные библиометрические критерии, применяемые для оценки научной деятельности. Трансплантология. 2014;(4):34-39.
For citation:
Lukyanova Е.Е. Contemporary bibliometric criteria used for measuring a research impact. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2014;(4):34-39. (In Russ.)
Просмотров:
589
Послать статью по эл. почте 