The role of hepatic biopsy in liver graft evaluation during liver procurement
Abstract
Material and methods. The study included 341 cases of cadaveric donor liver transplantations. Patients were divided in two groups: the study group where the rapid graft biopsy processing was performed (n=163) and the comparison group (n=178) without biopsy processing. Livers with macrosteatosis of over 50% of graft parenchyma or with severe necrosis and structural damage were discarded.
Results. The rates of ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI), initial poor graft function (IPGF), and primary graft nonfunction (PNF) were significantly lower in the study group. There were no significant differences between two groups in cold ischemia time.
Conclusion: rapid histological examination provides a useful tool to avoid life threatening LT complications such as severe IRI, IPGF, and PNF.
About the Authors
M. S. NovruzbekovRussian Federation
O. D. Olisov
Russian Federation
V. A. Gulyaev
Russian Federation
K. N. Lutsyk
Russian Federation
E. I. Ryaboshtanova
Russian Federation
A. S. Tertychnyy
Russian Federation
O. F. Vostrikova
Russian Federation
A. S. Rozhenkov
Russian Federation
References
1. Pogrebnichenko I.V. Effective use of multi organ donor liver transplantation: Dr. med. sci. diss. Moscow, 2014. 143 p. (In Russian).
2. Angelico, M. Donor liver steatosis and graft selection for liver transplantation: a short review / M. Angelico // Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol Sci. – 2005. – Vol. 9, N. 5. – P. 295–297.
3. Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index / S. Feng, N.P. Goodrich, J.L. Bragg-Gresham [et al.] // Am. J. Transplantat. – 2006. – Vol. 6, N. 4. – P. 783–790.
4. Post reperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: From pathophysiology
5. to therapy and preventive strategies /A. Siniscalchi, L. Gamberini, C. Laici [et al.] // World J. Gastroenterol. – 2016. – Vol. 22, N. 4. – P. 1551–1569.
6. Busuttil, R W. Transplantation of the Liver / R.W. Busuttil, G.B. Klintman.- 3rd ed. – Elsevier, 2015. – 1569 p.
7. Boyer, T. Zakim and Boyer’s hepatology. A text book of liver disease: 2-Volume Set / T. Boyer, T. Wright, M. Manns. – 5th еd. – Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2006. – 1578 p.
8. Khubutiya M.Sh., Gulyaev V.A., Zimina L.N., et al. Comprehensive assessment of the liver after the laparotomy in multiorgan donors. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov. 2012;1:41–49. (In Russian).
9. Initial poor graft dysfunction and primary graft non-function after orthotopic liver transplantation / Chen Hao, Xie Junjie, Shen Baiyong [et al.] // Liver Biopsy in Modern Medicine / ed. Y. Mizuguchi. – InTech, 2011. – P. 183– 206.
10. Risk factor for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation – a multivariate analysis / R.L. Ploeg, A.M. D’Alessandro, S.J. Knechtle [et al.] // Transplantation. – 1993. – Vol. 55, N. 4. – P. 807–813.
11. Predictive factors of early postoperative graft function in human liver transplantation / F.X. Gonzalez, A. Rimola, L.Grande [et al.] // Hepatology. – 1994. – Vol. 20, N. 3. – P. 565–573.
12. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors / K.M. Otthoff, L. Kulik, B. Samstein [et al.] // Liver Transplantation. – 2010. – Vol. 16, N. 8. – Р. 943–949.
13. Analysis of initial poor graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation: experience of an australian single liver transplantation center / A. Nanashima, P. Pillay, D. Verran [et al.] // Transplant. Proc. – 2002. – Vol. 34, N. 4. – P. 1231–1235.
14. Combination of extended donor criteria and changes in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score predict patient survival and primary dysfunction in liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis / G.R. Silberhumer, H. Pokorny, H. Hetz [et al.] // Transplantation. – 2007. – Vol. 83, N. 5. – P. 588–592.
15. Poor initial graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation: can it be predicted and does it affect outcome? An analysis of 125 adult primary transplantations / J.K. Maring, I.J. Klompmaker, J.H. Zwaveling [et al.] // Clin. Transplant. – 1997. – Vol. 11, N. 5. – Pt 1. – P. 373–379.
16. D'Alessandro A.M. Liver transplantation: Expanding donor pool. American society of transplant surgery. Available at: http://asts.org/docs/default-source/resource/liver-transplantation-nbspexpanding-the-donor-pool.pdf?sfvrsn=0
17. Effect of macrovescicular steatosis and other donor and recipient characteristics on the outcome of liver transplantation / F. Zamboni, A. Franchello,E. David [et al.] // Clin. Transplant. – 2001. – Vol. 15, N. 1. – P. 53–57.
18. Steatosis in donor and transplant liver biopsies / H. Crowley, W.D. Levis, F. Gordon [et al.] // Hum. Pathol. – 2000. – Vol. 31, N. 10. – P. 1209–1213.
19. The Impact of Hepatic Steatosis on Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Experimental Studies: A Systematic Review / M. J. J. Chu, A.J. Hickey, A.R. Phillips, A.S Bartlett // BioMed Res Int. – 2013. – Vol. 2013. – Р. 192029.
20. Liver transplantations with donor aged 60 years and above: the low liver damage strategy / M. Ravaioli, G.L. Grasi, M. Cescon [et al.] // Transplant. International. – 2009. – Vol. 22, N. 4. – P. 423–433.
21. The role of hepatic biopsy to detect macrovacuolar steatosis during liver procurement / G.L. Adani, U. Baccarani, M. Sainz-Barriga [et al.] // Transplant. Proc. – 2006. – Vol. 38, N. 5. – P. 1404– 1406.
22. Current practice regarding the use of fatty livers: a trans-Atlantic survey /C.J. Imber, S.D. St Peter, I. Lopez [et al.] // Liver Transpl. – 2002. – Vol. 8, N. 6. – P. 545–549.
23. Hepatic steatosis and its relationship to transplantation / C.J. Imber, S.D. St Peter, A. Hand, P.J. Friend // Liver Transplant. – 2002. – Vol. 8, N. 5. – P. 415–423.
24. Nocito, A. When is steatosis too much for transplantation? / A. Nocito, A.M. ElBadry, P.A. Clavien // J. Hepatol. – 2006. – Vol. 45, N. 4. – P. 494–499.
25. The use of fatty liver grafts in mo dern allocation systems: risk assessment by the balance of risk (BAR) score / P. Dutkowski, A. Schlegel, K. Slankamenac [et al.] // Ann. Surg. – 2012. – Vol. 256, N. 5. – P. 861–868.
26.
27.
Review
For citations:
Novruzbekov M.S., Olisov O.D., Gulyaev V.A., Lutsyk K.N., Ryaboshtanova E.I., Tertychnyy A.S., Vostrikova O.F., Rozhenkov A.S. The role of hepatic biopsy in liver graft evaluation during liver procurement. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2016;(4):19-26.