PHENOMENON OF DEMIKHOV. In the Sklifosovsky Institute (1960–1986). Approaches to solving the problem of organ and tissue transplantation in the USSR and abroad (1967)
https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-179-197
Abstract
Analysis of the materials of the 2nd All-Union conference on the problem of tissue incompatibility, conservation and transplantation of tissues and organs (Odessa, 1967) showed that Soviet and foreign scientists had similar approaches to solving the problem of organ and tissue transplantation. Soviet scientists spoke about overcoming tissue incompatibility by hybridization of plants and chimerization of animals, about the effect of drug sleep on transplant immunity, about neurohumoral immunological shifts and the role of the central and peripheral nervous systems in the engraftment of grafts, about the influence of external factors on immunity. They also discussed the characterization of the antigenic structure of grafts, the role of DNA in immunity, the genetic transformation of homomaterial, the use of pharmacological agents to suppress immunogenesis, the cryopreservation of auto- and homo-organs and tissues with perfusion of their vascular bed, and the study of immunogenesis at the molecular level. A year earlier, the Americans discussed immunological paralysis, the effect on the recipient's immunity of the donor's blood transfused to him and its components, and biochemical studies of immunity. At the same time, without any ethical doubts, American scientists conducted experiments, including clinical ones, with multiple passages of homosexual skin, with exchange transfusion of blood to newborns and subsequent transplantation of homosexual donors to them, with irradiation of recipients with powerful doses of X-rays. It is shown that most of the trends that had been developed by V.P. Demikhov, were approved by the 2nd All-Union Conference. But what he lacked was close and comprehensive integration with morphologists, physiologists, immunologists, biochemists, pharmacologists and, sadly, with clinical surgeons. Based on the research conducted, an unambiguous conclusion can be drawn: Soviet scientists should not have criticized V.P. Demikhov for his "misunderstanding" of immunology, and to help him in every possible way, directing his energy in the right direction.
About the Author
S. P. GlyantsevRussian Federation
Sergey P. Glyantsev, Prof., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of the History of Cardiovascular Surgery, A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Head of the Sector for the History of Medicine and Factography of the Department for the History of Medicine, N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
135 Roublyevskoe Hwy., Moscow 121552
12 Bldg. 1 Vorontsovo Pole St., Moscow 105064
References
1. Glyantsev SP, Gorelik BM, Werner A. Phenomenon of Demikhov. In the Sklifosovsky Institute (1960–1986). C.N. Barnard and the first clinical heart transplantation (December 3, 1967). V.P. Demikhov and C.N. Barnard: touchpoints. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2020;12(4):332–352. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2020-12-4-332-352
2. Glyantsev SP, Shatunova YuG, Werner A. Phenomenon of Demikhov. In the Sklifosovsky Institute (1960–1986). Demijоv V.P. Transplante experimental de órganosvitales. Madrid: Editorial Atlante, 1967. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2021;13(1):74–92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-1-74-92
3. Zhukov-Verezhnikov NN, Mayskiy IN, Tribulev GP. Sovremennaya immunologiya i problemy nesovmestimosti tkaney. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 5–9. (In Russ.).
4. Kovanov VV, Kirpatovskiy ID. Nekotorye voprosy plastiki organov i tkaney. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 16–19. (In Russ.).
5. Kositskiy GI. Problema biologicheskoy nesovmestimosti tkaney pri gomotransplantatsii i sovremennye predstavleniya ob obmene belkov. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 19–22. (In Russ.).
6. Demikhov VP. O prichinakh gibeli gomotranplantatov organov i tkaney. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 36–39. (In Russ.).
7. Goryaynov VM. Elektrokardiograficheskie issledovaniya peresazhennogo i ozhivlennogo serdtsa. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 524–528. (In Russ.).
8. Demikhov VP, Zaretskaya YuM. Metodika gomoplasticheskoy peresadki grudiny na sosudistoy nozhke. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 531–532. (In Russ.).
9. Efimov MI. O nekotorykh putyakh preodoleniya nevospriimchivosti retsipienta k gomotransplantatu. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 76–79. (In Russ.).
10. Lapchinskiy AG, Lebedeva NS, Eyngorn AG. Opyt peresadki kozhi i pochek, konservirovannykh glubokim zamorazhivaniem do -196° v zhidkom azote. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 106–109. (In Russ.).
11. Eyngorn AG, Khorunzhaya KYu, Lebedeva NS, Gureeva KF. Zamechaniya k metodike konservirovaniya tselykh organov zamorazhivaniem do nizkikh temperatur. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 110–111. (In Russ.).
12. Yutanov SI. Nekotorye voprosy peresadki konservirovannykh legkikh v eksperimente. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 112–114. (In Russ.).
13. Tarasov MM. Konferentsiya po gomotransplantatsii v N'yu-Yorke. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 572–576. (In Russ.).
14. Merrill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, Guild WR. Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins. JAMA. 1956;160(4):277–282. PMID: 13278189 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1956.02960390027008
15. Merrill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, Friedman EA, Dealy JB, Dammin GJ. Successful homotransplantation of the kidney between nonidentical twins. New England Journal of Medicine. 1960;262:1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196006232622501
16. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH, Wilson RE, Dammin GJ. Prolonged survival of human-kidney homografts by immunosuppressive drug therapy. New England Journal of Medicine. 1963;268:1315–1323. PMID: 13936775 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196306132682401
17. Osnovnye napravleniya issledovaniy, odobrennye 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsiey po probleme tkanevoy nesovmestimosti, konservatsii i transplantatsii tkaney i organov. In: Puchkovskaya NV. (ed.) Problemy gomoplastiki i alloplastiki: materialy 2-y Vsesoyuznoy konferentsii. Kiev: Zdorov’ya Publ.; 1967. p. 577–581. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Glyantsev S.P. PHENOMENON OF DEMIKHOV. In the Sklifosovsky Institute (1960–1986). Approaches to solving the problem of organ and tissue transplantation in the USSR and abroad (1967). Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2021;13(2):179-197. https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-179-197