Analysis of the application of different bone grafting procedures in patients with intra-articular fractures
Abstract
From 2008 to 2014, 298 patients with traumatic cancellous bone were treated in N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department. The bone graft substitutes used were an autograft from the iliac crest, allogenic grafts (non-demineralized cancellous bone, collagen type 1 sponge with bone chips, combined perforated non-dematerialized cancellous bone with collagen type 1 sponge).
Long-term outcomes after allografting did not differ from the outcomes of the treatment with the iliac crest autograft. The allograft of non-demineralized cancellous bone has long-lasting mechanical strength, which in combination with osteosynthesis provides a stable fixation, and early weight bearing. Despite a lower mechanical strength, the collagen
type 1 sponge with bone chips has a more pronounced osteoconductive effect. We have created and applied a combined perforated non-demineralized cancellous bone with collagen type 1 sponge that has good mechanical properties and a pronounced osteoconductive effect.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Vaza
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Fayn
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. A. Ivanov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. Yu. Klyukvin
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Slastinin
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Borovkova
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. B. Khvatov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Management of massive posttraumatic bone defects in the lower limb with the Ilizarov technique / M. Chaddha, D. Gulati, A.P. Singh [et al.] // Acta Orthop. Belg. – 2010. – Vol. 76, N. 6. – P. 811–820.
2. Bobrov, G.D. Ten year experience with use of Ilizarov bone transport for tibial defects / G.D. Bobrov, S. Gold, D. Zinar // Bull Hosp. Jt. Dis. – 2003. – Vol. 61, N. 3–4. – P. 101–107.
3. Management of segmental defects by the Ilizarov intercalary bone transport method / S.A. Green, J.M. Jackson, D.M. Wall [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1992. – N.280. – P. 136–142.
4. Green, S.A. Skeletal defects: a comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental defects / S.A. Green // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1994. – N. 301. – P. 111–117.
5. Effortless effort in bone regeneration: a review / G. Nazirkar, S. Singh, V. Dole, A. Nikam // J. Int. Oral. Health. – 2014. – Vol. 6, N. 3. – P. 120–124.
6. Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and bone autograft in a goat model / B.H. Fellah, O. Gauthier, P. Weiss [et al.] // Biomaterials. – 2008. – Vol. 29, N. 9. – P. 1177–1188.
7. Recommendations and considerations for the use of biologics in orthopedic surgery / S. Zwingenberger, C. Nich, R.D. Valladares [et al.] // BioDrugs. – 2012. – Vol. 26, N. 4. – P. 245–256.
8. Панкратов А.С. Костная пластика в стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии. Остеопластические материалы: Рук-во для врачей / А.С. Панкратов, М.В. Лекишвили, И.С. Копецкий; Под ред. А.С. Панкратова. – М.: БИНОМ, 2011. – 272 с. Pankratov A.S., Lekishvili M.V., Kopetskiy I.S. Kostnaya plastika v stomatologii i chelyustno-litsevoy khirurgii [Bone grafting in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery]. In: ed. Pankratov A.S. Osteoplasticheskie materialy: ruk-vo dlya vrachey [Osteoplastic materials: a guide for doctors]. Moscow: BINOM Publ., 2011. 272 p. (In Russian).
9. The principles and applications of fresh frozen allografts to bone and joint reconstruction / L.A. Aponte-Tinao, L.E. Ritacco, J.I. Albergo [et al.] // Orthop. Clin. North Am. – 2014. – Vol. 45, N. 2. – P. 257–269.
10. Arner, J.W. A historical review of common bone graft materials in foot and ankle surgery / J.W. Arner, R.D. Santrock // Foot Ankle Spec. – 2014. – Vol. 7, N. 2. – P. 143–151.
11. Lee, E.J. Biomaterials for tissue engineering / E.J. Lee, F.K. Kasper, A.G. Mikos // Ann. Biomed. Eng. – 2014. – Vol. 42, N. 2. – P. 323–337.
12. Bone grafts and bone substitutes for opening-wedge osteotomies of the knee: A systematic review / N.J. Lash, J.A. Feller, L.M. Batty [et al.] // Arthroscopy. – 2015. – Vol. 31, N. 4. – P. 720–730.
13. Parikh, S.N. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future / S.N. Parikh // J. Postgrad. Med. – 2002. – Vol. 48, N. 2. – P. 142–148.
14. Опыт применения Коллапана в травматологии и ортопедии / Г.А. Кесян, Г.Н. Берченко, Р.З. Уразгильдеев [и др.] // Поликлиника. – 2012. – № 4(2). – С. 50–51.
15. Polo-Corrales, L. Scaffold design for bone regeneration / L. Polo-Corrales, M. Latorre-Esteves, J.E. Ramirez-Vick // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. – 2014. – Vol. 14, N. 1. – P. 15–56.
Review
For citations:
Vaza A.Yu., Fayn A.M., Ivanov P.A., Klyukvin I.Yu., Slastinin V.V., Borovkova N.V., Khvatov V.B. Analysis of the application of different bone grafting procedures in patients with intra-articular fractures. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2015;(4):6-12.
Views:
637
